(Mis)information society
— What's the real truth and does it matter? Doctoring Wikipedia articles and scamming the gullible is all the rage these days.”
First, there was panic over students using the World Wide Web to cheat on their essays.
Then it was revealed that CIA employees had been doctoring Wikipedia articles on the subject of such public menaces as President Ahmadinejad and Oprah Winfrey.
The Internet and Hard Fact have always enjoyed a difficult relationship. Sometimes the truths were held to be self-evident to all but the most gullible users (remember the Nigerian 419 Scam?); others were open to interpretation (cf. the Taser incidents at the Universities of Florida and Los Angeles respectively).
For millions around the world, Wikipedia is the cutting edge of information delivery. At the time of writing, the website claims to deliver in the region of 8.2 million articles in 253 languages [source] – it’s a veritable fountain of knowledge, much to the bitter chagrin of commercial encyclopaedia publishers.
Anyone can edit Wikipedia and access to content is free. Whereas access to the 120,000+ online articles provided by a leading commercial encyclopaedia is normally about £5.00 per month. Put it that way and a couple of key points emerge:
- You’re more likely to expect (and forgive) if a bit of inaccuracy creeps into 8.2 million freely available articles in 253 languages
- A commercial encyclopaedia couldn’t compete, even with “a staff of 19 full-time editors and over 4,000 expert contributors” [Encyclopaedia Britannica, source].
We don’t really have any numbers on Wikipedia vandalism. One or two concerned parties have taken to documenting outrages, often with the righteous indignation of a juror.
Meantime, those of us on the fringe of the debate might be inclined to see the funny side. Am I the only puerile fool barely able to stifle a giggle at Bill Gates’ portrait defaced with a silly moustache? Or the assertion that George Washington “had a shit on a stick and then told people that it was OK to have unprotected sex …”? Or this non-sequitor I found this evening?
Comments
One response so far to (Mis)information society
Why not give me your comments?
See also:
Leave the Internet alone
The day after some websites went dark in protest at proposed US laws on online intellectual property rights, the authorities shut down a file sharing service.
- Originally published: 20 Jan 2012 in Editorial, Technology
Only on the Internet
Some things just wouldn’t work offline would they?
- Originally published: 27 Jul 2006 in Technology
Out of touch
When it comes to the Internet, crime does pay. Shame so few of our public sector institutions understand it.
- Originally published: 6 Feb 2007 in Technology
Once upon a time there was an open brief…
Surf’s not up: web designers can no longer enjoy a rock-n-roll lifestyle now that clients expect concrete results.
- Originally published: 2 Dec 2005 in Technology
Web 2.0: better stay beta?
Seems like there’s a name for everything these days. The groove between the two branches of your moustache right under your nostrils is called a philtrum. “Web 2.0″ is another of
- Originally published: 27 Jan 2006 in Technology
Who you gonna call?
Hello you, I'm Mike Padgett. I'm not a Princeton curator, Knoxville mayoral candidate, Kentuckian pastor or Arizona journalist, I just share the same name. In fact, I am a consultant working in user experience and information design.
I also enjoy travel, concerts, films and walking.
I'm originally from Yorkshire, England but nowadays I live in Belgium. My current favourite Belgian beer is Black Albert.
Shameless self-promotion
Over a year in the making, Dopeology.org is my latest personal project: a topology of doping in thirty years of European pro road cycling.
I collected information from thousands of sources, then I modelled and published it via a lightweight user interface.
October 5th, 2008 at 15:58
[...] with as yet uncertain results. Just as the Internet provides us with a wealth of data (of varying accuracy) or we can buy our furniture of the shelf and put it together (if we’re given the right [...]